On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is about 75% cheaper than the Ford Kuga 2nd Gen EcoBoost 150 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
518 €per year
17,3 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,45 € per 100 km · 2 590 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
Fuel price
Petrol 95 : 2,03 €/L·Diesel : 2,25 €/L
prix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 25/08/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement
| Profile | Split | Scenic | Kuga | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 441 € | 2 249 € | 1 808 € | Scenic |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 518 € | 2 013 € | 1 494 € | Scenic |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 613 € | 1 833 € | 1 220 € | Scenic |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is about 75% cheaper than the Ford Kuga 2nd Gen EcoBoost 150 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
The declared range of the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is 620 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.