On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW i5 xDrive40 Touring is about 25% cheaper than the Tesla Model 3 Performance with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
378 €per year
12,6 kWh/100 km weighted · 2,52 € per 100 km · 1 888 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | Model 3 | i5 | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 511 € | 321 € | 190 € | i5 |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 521 € | 378 € | 143 € | i5 |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 548 € | 447 € | 102 € | i5 |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the BMW i5 xDrive40 Touring is about 25% cheaper than the Tesla Model 3 Performance with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Tesla Model 3 Performance offers more range: 547 km vs 467 km for BMW i5 xDrive40 Touring (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The BMW i5 xDrive40 Touring is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.