On a 100 km mixed trip, the BYD Atto 3 Extended Range is about 10% cheaper than the Toyota bZ4X AWD with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
462 €per year
15,4 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,08 € per 100 km · 2 307 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | bZ4X | Atto 3 | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 425 € | 442 € | 17 € | bZ4X |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 499 € | 462 € | 38 € | Atto 3 |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 591 € | 480 € | 111 € | Atto 3 |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the BYD Atto 3 Extended Range is about 10% cheaper than the Toyota bZ4X AWD with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Toyota bZ4X AWD offers more range: 466 km vs 420 km for BYD Atto 3 Extended Range (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The BYD Atto 3 Extended Range is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.