On a 100 km mixed trip, the BYD Atto 3 Extended Range is about 10% cheaper than the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
462 €per year
15,4 kWh/100 km weighted · 3.08 € per 100 km · 2 307 kWh per year
509 €per year
17,0 kWh/100 km weighted · 3.39 € per 100 km · 2 543 kWh per year
| Profile | Split | AA · Atto 3 | BB · Scenic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City70 / 25 / 5 | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 442 € | 433 € | Nearly level |
| Mixed30 / 50 / 20 | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 462 € | 509 € | 47 € · Atto 3 |
| Long-distance10 / 40 / 50 | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 480 € | 602 € | 122 € · Atto 3 |
Cumulative saving for the Atto 3 Extended Range
Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.
On a 100 km mixed trip, the BYD Atto 3 Extended Range is about 10% cheaper than the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 offers more range: 430 km vs 420 km for BYD Atto 3 Extended Range (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The BYD Atto 3 Extended Range is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.