On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is about 20% cheaper than the Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
511 €per year
17,0 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,41 € per 100 km · 2 556 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | EX40 | Model | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 606 € | 501 € | 106 € | Model |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 634 € | 511 € | 123 € | Model |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 660 € | 526 € | 134 € | Model |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is about 20% cheaper than the Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD offers more range: 507 km vs 340 km for Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Tesla Model Y Long Range AWD is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.