Over 0–100 km/h, Giulia Quadrifoglio wins (3,94 s vs 5,40 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Giulia Quadrifoglio | 330d F30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,94 s−1,46 s | 5,40 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,74 s−1,98 s | 13,72 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,93 s−4,08 s | 25,01 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 307 km/h+57 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,10 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,78 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Giulia Quadrifoglio | 330d F30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,19 s | 1,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,98 s | 2,24 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,18 s | 3,90 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,94 s | 5,40 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,97 s | 7,31 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,57 s | 12,66 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,32 s | 21,37 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,74 s | 13,72 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,93 s | 25,01 s |
| Top speed limited | 307 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 580 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 560 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Giulia Quadrifoglio hits 100 km/h in 3.94 s versus 5.40 s for the 330d. At this point, the Giulia Quadrifoglio leads by 1.46 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Giulia Quadrifoglio is doing 164 km/h against 134 km/h for the 330d. The gap is 1.11 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Giulia Quadrifoglio crosses the line in 11.74 s versus 13.71 s. The 1.98 s gap represents roughly 88 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Giulia Quadrifoglio continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 228 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Giulia Quadrifoglio finishes in 20.93 s versus 25.01 s, with a 4.08 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Giulia Quadrifoglio is capped at 307 km/h, the 330d at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.10 kg/hp vs 6.78 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.42 seconds. The 1.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Giulia Quadrifoglio wins (3,94 s vs 5,40 s).
Giulia Quadrifoglio goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,94 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Giulia Quadrifoglio: 510 hp, ratio 3,10 kg/hp. 330d F30: 258 hp, ratio 6,78 kg/hp.
Giulia Quadrifoglio: 307 km/h. 330d F30: 250 km/h.