Among the 7 saloons 2014–2018, the Giulia Quadrifoglio ranks 1st of 7 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio), 1st of 7 in Top speed (307 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio), 1st of 7 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio).
952 Ph.I · GENERATION 2016 → · SALOON
Alfa RomeoICE
Giulia Quadrifoglio
510 hp, 3,9 s 0-100 : among the 7 saloons 2014–2018, the Giulia Quadrifoglio ranks 1st of 7 in 0–100 km/h, 1st of 7 in Top speed, 1st of 7 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
510hp
600 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.9s
VMax 307 km/h
Cons.
9.0L
/100 km
Tank
58L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 2,891 cm³ |
| Power | 510 hp |
| Couple | 600 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 9.0 L/100km |
| Tank | 58 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,9 s |
| VMax | 307 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,642 mm |
| Width | 1,860 mm |
| Height | 1,436 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,580 kg |
| Cd | 0.24 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 7 saloons, the Giulia Quadrifoglio ranks (best in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 1st of 7 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s), 1st of 7 in Top speed (307 km/h), 1st of 7 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t). 1st of 7 in 0–100 km/h (3.9 s), 1st of 7 in Top speed (307 km/h), 1st of 7 in Power-to-weight (323 hp/t).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 9,0 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
No alternative dominates across all segment dimensions.
Acceleration: 3.9 s 0-100 (1st of 7 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Giulia Quadrifoglio ranks 1st of 7 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio (3.9 s).
Top speed: 307 km/h (1st of 7 in Top speed)
Top speed of 307 km/h. The segment reference reaches 307 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Giulia Quadrifoglio stands against saloons
Comparison across 7 saloons marketed between 2014–2018.
0–100 km/h1e / 7
3,9 s
Min 6,0 s · Lexus IS 350 F Sport RWDMax 3,9 s · Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
Top speed1e / 7
307 km/h
Min 240 km/h · Lexus IS 350 F Sport RWDMax 307 km/h · Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
Power-to-weight1e / 7
323 hp/t
Min 184 hp/t · Lexus IS 350 F Sport RWDMax 323 hp/t · Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
M3 Competition510 hp · 0-100 3.9 s
M3 Competition Sedan510 hp · 0-100 3.9 s
M3 Competition xDrive510 hp · 0-100 3.5 s
M4 Competition510 hp · 0-100 3.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Giulia Quadrifoglio
Frequently asked questions
Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.