Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio vs Tesla Model 3 Performance: which is truly faster?

Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.04 s versus 3.94 s for the Giulia Quadrifoglio. The instant torque of 769 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model 3 Performance leads by 0.90 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.

At 200 metres, the Model 3 Performance is doing 162 km/h against 164 km/h for the Giulia Quadrifoglio. The gap is 0.67 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Performance crosses the line in 11.12 s versus 11.74 s. The 0.62 s gap represents roughly 34 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Model 3 Performance maxes out at 261 km/h while the Giulia Quadrifoglio keeps accelerating towards 307 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.54 s.

At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Performance finishes in 20.48 s versus 20.93 s, with just 0.44 s to spare. The Giulia Quadrifoglio fails to fully close the launch gap.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Giulia Quadrifoglio is capped at 307 km/h, the Model 3 Performance at 261 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.51 seconds. The 0.90 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.