Over 0–100 km/h, Giulia Quadrifoglio wins (3,94 s vs 8,23 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Giulia Quadrifoglio | XC40 B4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,94 s−4,29 s | 8,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,74 s−4,37 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,93 s−8,46 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 307 km/h+127 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,10 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,17 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Giulia Quadrifoglio | XC40 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,19 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,98 s | 3,12 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,18 s | 5,74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,94 s | 8,23 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,97 s | 11,35 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,57 s | 21,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,32 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 11,74 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,93 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed | 307 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 580 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Geartronic |
Off the line, the Giulia Quadrifoglio hits 100 km/h in 3.94 s versus 8.23 s for the XC40 B4. At this point, the Giulia Quadrifoglio leads by 4.29 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Giulia Quadrifoglio is doing 164 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 2.70 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Giulia Quadrifoglio crosses the line in 11.74 s versus 16.10 s. The 4.37 s gap represents roughly 160 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Giulia Quadrifoglio continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 228 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Giulia Quadrifoglio finishes in 20.93 s versus 29.39 s, with a 8.46 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Giulia Quadrifoglio is capped at 307 km/h, the XC40 B4 at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.10 kg/hp vs 8.17 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 4.29 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Giulia Quadrifoglio wins (3,94 s vs 8,23 s).
Giulia Quadrifoglio goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,94 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Giulia Quadrifoglio: 510 hp, ratio 3,10 kg/hp. XC40 B4: 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp.
Giulia Quadrifoglio: 307 km/h. XC40 B4: 180 km/h.