Sur 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Quadrifoglio gagne (3,83 s vs 4,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-PACE SVR | Stelvio Quadrifoglio | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 3,83 s+0,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 11,86 s+0,44 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s | 21,59 s+0,47 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h+2 km/h | 283 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,68 kg/hp | 3,59 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-PACE SVR | Stelvio Quadrifoglio |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 1,03 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,10 s | 1,72 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,44 s | 2,92 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 3,83 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,56 s | 5,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,68 s | 8,13 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,35 s | 12,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 11,86 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s | 21,59 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h | 283 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 024 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | F-PACE SVR 2021 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 830 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 4.35 s for the F-PACE SVR. At this point, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio leads by 0.52 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio is doing 156 km/h against 154 km/h for the F-PACE SVR. The gap is 0.41 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio crosses the line in 11.86 s versus 12.30 s. The 0.44 s gap represents roughly 23 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 216 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Stelvio Quadrifoglio finishes in 21.59 s versus 22.05 s, with a 0.46 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (285 vs 283 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the F-PACE SVR and the Stelvio Quadrifoglio are governed to 285 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.68 kg/hp vs 3.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.20 seconds. The 0.52 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Stelvio Quadrifoglio gagne (3,83 s vs 4,35 s).
F-PACE SVR passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).
F-PACE SVR : 550 hp, ratio 3,68 kg/hp. Stelvio Quadrifoglio : 510 hp, ratio 3,59 kg/hp.
F-PACE SVR : 285 km/h. Stelvio Quadrifoglio : 283 km/h.