X761 Ph.II · GENERATION 2021 · FAMILY SUV
JaguarICE

F-PACE SVR

550 hp, 4,3 s 0-100 : among the 13 D-SUV 2019–2023, the F-PACE SVR ranks 3rd of 13 in 0–100 km/h, 1st of 13 in Top speed, 1st of 13 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate4,30315,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhConsommation →

Power

550hp

680 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.3s

VMax 285 km/h

Cons.

14.2L

/100 km

Tank

82L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications Jaguar F-PACE SVR

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown
Displacement5,000 cm\u00b3
Power550 hp
Couple680 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionF-PACE SVR 2021

Consumption

Cons. WLTP14,2 L/100km
Tank82 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,3 s
VMax285 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,731 mm
Width1,936 mm
Height1,660 mm
Kerb weight2,024 kg
Cd0.36

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 13 D-SUV, the F-PACE SVR ranks (top 3 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 3rd of 13 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s), 1st of 13 in Top speed (285 km/h), 1st of 13 in Power-to-weight (272 hp/t). 3rd of 13 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s), 1st of 13 in Top speed (285 km/h), 1st of 13 in Power-to-weight (272 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 14,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X3 M Competition (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.3 s 0-100 (3rd of 13 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the F-PACE SVR ranks 3rd of 13 in 0–100 km/h, 0.2 s off the reference Bmw X3 M Competition (4.1 s).

Top speed: 285 km/h (1st of 13 in Top speed)

Top speed of 285 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the F-PACE SVR stands against D-SUV

Comparison across 13 D-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.

0–100 km/h

3eout of 13

4,3 s
Min5,7 s · Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300
Max4,1 s · Bmw X3 M Competition

Top speed

1eout of 13

285 km/h
Min200 km/h · Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300
Max285 km/h · Jaguar F-PACE SVR

Power-to-weight

1eout of 13

272 hp/t
Min157 hp/t · Renault Rafale E-Tech Full Hybrid 4x4 300
Max272 hp/t · Jaguar F-PACE SVR

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the F-PACE SVR

Take the next step

Find a F-PACE SVR or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

Jaguar F-PACE SVR: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the F-PACE SVR rank in its segment?#

Among the 13 D-SUV 2019–2023, the F-PACE SVR ranks 3rd of 13 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition), 1st of 13 in Top speed (285 km/h, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR), 1st of 13 in Power-to-weight (272 hp/t, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR).

How much does the F-PACE SVR cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw X3 M Competition instead?#

The Bmw X3 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s vs 4.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the F-PACE SVR vs Bmw X3 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.