X2 sDrive18i
136 hp, 9,6 s 0-100 : among the 37 C-SUV 2019–2023, the X2 sDrive18i ranks 14th of 37 in Combined consumption, 25th of 33 in Tank range, 30th of 37 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
136hp
220 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.6s
VMax 205 km/h
Cons.
6.0L
/100 km
Tank
51L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X2 sDrive18i
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,499 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 136 hp |
| Couple | 220 Nm |
| Gearbox | Dual Clutch 6 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | X2 sDrive18i |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,0 L/100km |
| Tank | 51 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,6 s |
| VMax | 205 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,360 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm |
| Width | 1,824 mm |
| Height | 1,526 mm |
| Boot | 470 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,410 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 137 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 37 C-SUV, the X2 sDrive18i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (14th of 37 in Combined consumption)
The X2 sDrive18i consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X2 sDrive18d (4.8 L/100).
Tank range: 850 km (25th of 33 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X2 sDrive18i covers 850 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1063 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the X2 sDrive18i stands against C-SUV
Comparison across 37 C-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption
14eout of 37
Tank range
25eout of 33
0–100 km/h
30eout of 37
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q3 Sportback
150 hp · 0-100 9.1 s
Q3 SUV
150 hp · 0-100 9.1 s
C5 Aircross PureTech 130 FWD
132 hp · 0-100 10.7 s
Niro HEV FWD
141 hp · 0-100 11.0 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X2 F39 range
Generation F39 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F39
Compare
Popular duels involving the X2 sDrive18i
Take the next step
Find a X2 sDrive18i or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW X2 sDrive18i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 37 C-SUV 2019–2023, the X2 sDrive18i ranks 14th of 37 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Bmw X2 sDrive18d), 25th of 33 in Tank range (850 km, behind the Bmw X2 sDrive18d), 30th of 37 in 0–100 km/h (9.6 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).
850 km on a full tank (6.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 25th of 33 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X2 sDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X2 sDrive18i vs Bmw X2 sDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.