Among the 30 C-SUV 2019–2023, the X2 sDrive18i ranks 12th of 30 in Combined consumption (6.0 L/100, behind the Bmw X2 sDrive18d), 19th of 25 in Tank range (850 km, behind the Bmw X2 sDrive18d), 26th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (9.6 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).
F39 · GENERATION 2021 → · COMPACT SUV
BMWICE
X2 sDrive18i
136 hp, 9,6 s 0-100 : among the 30 C-SUV 2019–2023, the X2 sDrive18i ranks 12th of 30 in Combined consumption, 19th of 25 in Tank range, 26th of 30 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
136hp
220 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
9.6s
VMax 205 km/h
Cons.
6.0L
/100 km
Tank
51L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X2 sDrive18i
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,499 cm³ |
| Power | 136 hp |
| Couple | 220 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 6 rapports Automatique |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.0 L/100km |
| Tank | 51 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,6 s |
| VMax | 205 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,360 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,670 mm |
| Width | 1,824 mm |
| Height | 1,526 mm |
| Boot | 470 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,410 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 137 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 30 C-SUV, the X2 sDrive18i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 6.0 L/100 L/100 (12th of 30 in Combined consumption)
The X2 sDrive18i consumes 6.0 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X2 sDrive18d (4.8 L/100).
Tank range: 850 km (19th of 25 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X2 sDrive18i covers 850 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1063 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the X2 sDrive18i stands against C-SUV
Comparison across 30 C-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption12e / 30
6 L/100
Min 8.6 L/100 · Cupra Formentor VZMax 4.8 L/100 · Bmw X2 sDrive18d
Tank range19e / 25
850 km
Min 705 km · SEAT Ateca 2.0 TSI 190 FR 4Drive 7DSGMax 1 063 km · Bmw X2 sDrive18d
0–100 km/h26e / 30
9,6 s
Min 10,7 s · Citroen C5 Aircross PureTech 130 FWDMax 4,9 s · Cupra Formentor VZ
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q3 Sportback150 hp · 0-100 9.1 s
Q3 SUV150 hp · 0-100 9.1 s
Q3 Sportback193 hp · 0-100 7.5 s
XC40 B4197 hp · 0-100 8.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X2 F39 range
Generation F39 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F39
Compare
Popular duels involving the X2 sDrive18i
Frequently asked questions
BMW X2 sDrive18i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
850 km on a full tank (6.0 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 19th of 25 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X2 sDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 6.0 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X2 sDrive18i vs Bmw X2 sDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.