Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,67 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M240i F44 | A110 GT 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,67 s | 3,92 s+0,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,78 s | 11,97 s+0,81 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,04 s | 21,76 s+1,28 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 272 km/h−22 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,49 kg/hp | 3,65 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M240i F44 | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,13 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,21 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,53 s | 3,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,67 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,03 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,80 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 15,53 s | 12,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,78 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,04 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic Sport transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 4.67 s for the M240i. At this point, the A110 GT 300 leads by 0.75 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 147 km/h for the M240i. The gap is 0.57 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 12.78 s. The 0.81 s gap represents roughly 41 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the A110 GT 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 205 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 GT 300 finishes in 21.76 s versus 23.03 s, with a 1.28 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the M240i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.49 kg/hp vs 3.65 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.84 seconds. The 0.75 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,67 s).
M240i F44 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,67 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M240i F44: 340 hp, ratio 4,49 kg/hp. A110 GT 300: 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
M240i F44: 250 km/h. A110 GT 300: 272 km/h.