Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,19 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 G82 | A110 GT 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s | 3,92 s+0,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s | 11,97 s+0,26 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s | 21,76 s+0,10 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 272 km/h−22 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,54 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,65 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 G82 | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,22 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,04 s | 1,89 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,31 s | 3,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,19 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,52 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,63 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,02 s | 12,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,23 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,86 s | 21,76 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 480 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 700 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 4.19 s for the Bmw M4. At this point, the A110 GT 300 leads by 0.28 s and sits roughly 4 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 155 km/h for the Bmw M4. The gap is 0.23 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 12.23 s. The 0.26 s gap represents roughly 14 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Bmw M4 maxes out at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h while the A110 GT 300 keeps accelerating towards 272 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.25 s.
At 1,000 metres, the A110 GT 300 finishes in 21.76 s versus 21.86 s, with just 0.10 s to spare. The Bmw M4 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw M4 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.54 kg/hp vs 3.65 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.20 seconds. The 0.28 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,19 s).
M4 G82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,19 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 G82: 480 hp, ratio 3,54 kg/hp. A110 GT 300: 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
M4 G82: 250 km/h. A110 GT 300: 272 km/h.