Sur 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 gagne (3,42 s vs 3,92 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M5 F90 | A110 GT 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,42 s−0,49 s | 3,92 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,25 s−0,72 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,43 s−1,33 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 272 km/h−22 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,65 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M5 F90 | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,97 s | 1,13 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,62 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,56 s | 3,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,42 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,38 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,00 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,73 s | 12,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,25 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,43 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the Bmw M5 hits 100 km/h in 3.43 s versus 3.92 s for the A110 GT 300. At this point, the Bmw M5 leads by 0.49 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M5 is doing 165 km/h against 157 km/h for the A110 GT 300. The gap is 0.49 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M5 crosses the line in 11.25 s versus 11.96 s. The 0.72 s gap represents roughly 38 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M5 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 231 km/h versus 215 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M5 finishes in 20.43 s versus 21.76 s, with a 1.33 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (272 km/h), the A110 GT 300 never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw M5 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.16 kg/hp vs 3.65 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.79 seconds. The 0.49 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M5 F90 gagne (3,42 s vs 3,92 s).
M5 F90 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,42 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M5 F90 : 600 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. A110 GT 300 : 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
M5 F90 : 250 km/h. A110 GT 300 : 272 km/h.