Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 gagne (3,92 s vs 5,52 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A110 GT 300 | Cayman 981 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,92 s−1,60 s | 5,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,97 s−1,67 s | 13,64 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,76 s−2,93 s | 24,69 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 272 km/h+19 km/h | 253 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,65 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,70 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A110 GT 300 | Cayman 981 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,89 s | 2,30 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,06 s | 4,02 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,92 s | 5,52 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,15 s | 7,16 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,21 s | 12,01 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,68 s | 19,90 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,97 s | 13,64 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,76 s | 24,69 s |
| Top speed | 272 km/h | 253 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 279 hp | Aluminum block and heads |
| Torque | 289 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 310 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 5.52 s for the Cayman. At this point, the A110 GT 300 leads by 1.60 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 136 km/h for the Cayman. The gap is 1.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 13.64 s. The 1.67 s gap represents roughly 77 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the A110 GT 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 190 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 GT 300 finishes in 21.76 s versus 24.68 s, with a 2.93 s lead.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.65 kg/hp vs 4.70 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.30 seconds. The 1.60 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 gagne (3,92 s vs 5,52 s).
A110 GT 300 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,92 secondes (simulation calibrée).
A110 GT 300 : 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp. Cayman 981 : 279 hp, ratio 4,70 kg/hp.
A110 GT 300 : 272 km/h. Cayman 981 : 253 km/h.