Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 gagne (3,92 s vs 8,23 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A110 GT 300 | XC40 B4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,92 s−4,32 s | 8,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,97 s−4,14 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,76 s−7,63 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 272 km/h+92 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,65 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,17 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A110 GT 300 | XC40 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,89 s | 3,12 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,06 s | 5,74 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,92 s | 8,23 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,15 s | 11,35 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,21 s | 21,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,68 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 11,97 s | 16,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,76 s | 29,39 s |
| Top speed | 272 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp | 2 |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 610 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Geartronic |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 8.23 s for the XC40 B4. At this point, the A110 GT 300 leads by 4.32 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 115 km/h for the XC40 B4. The gap is 2.65 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 16.10 s. The 4.14 s gap represents roughly 153 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the A110 GT 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 GT 300 finishes in 21.76 s versus 29.39 s, with a 7.63 s lead.
Electronically capped at 180 km/h, the XC40 B4 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.65 kg/hp vs 8.17 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 4.32 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 gagne (3,92 s vs 8,23 s).
A110 GT 300 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,92 secondes (simulation calibrée).
A110 GT 300 : 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp. XC40 B4 : 197 hp, ratio 8,17 kg/hp.
A110 GT 300 : 272 km/h. XC40 B4 : 180 km/h.