Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 gagne (3,92 s vs 4,21 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| P7 | A110 GT 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,21 s | 3,92 s+0,30 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,55 s | 11,97 s+0,58 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,25 s | 21,76 s+3,49 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 170 km/h | 272 km/h−102 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,81 kg/hp | 3,65 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | P7 | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,11 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,85 s | 1,89 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,09 s | 3,06 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,21 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,64 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,67 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 12,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,55 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,25 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 4.22 s for the P7. Despite lacking instant torque, 305 hp of power compensates. The 0.30 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 147 km/h for the P7. The gap is 0.24 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 12.54 s. The 0.58 s gap represents roughly 27 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the A110 GT 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 GT 300 finishes in 21.76 s versus 25.24 s, with a 3.49 s lead.
Electronically capped at 170 km/h, the P7 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.49 seconds. The 0.30 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 gagne (3,92 s vs 4,21 s).
P7 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,21 secondes (simulation calibrée).
P7 : 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp. A110 GT 300 : 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
P7 : 170 km/h. A110 GT 300 : 272 km/h.