Gen I · GENERATION 2020 · SALOON
XpengBEV

P7

424 hp, 450 km range, 4,3 s 0-100 : among the 8 saloons electric 2018–2022, the P7 ranks 7th of 7 in WLTP range, 5th of 5 in DC charge power, 5th of 8 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate54215,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhRange →

Power

424hp

655 Nm · 430 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

4.3s

VMax 170 km/h

Range

450km

WLTP

DC charging

80kW

Technical identity card

Full specifications Xpeng P7

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Puissance électrique430 hp
Combined power424 hp
Couple655 Nm
GearboxMono-rapport Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Battery and charging

Battery capacity75 kWh
Range WLTP450 km
Charge AC max11 kW
Charge DC max80 kW
Conso élec WLTP17.2 kWh/100km

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,3 s
VMax170 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Width1,896 mm
Height1,450 mm
Kerb weight2,040 kg
Cd0.236

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 8 saloons electric, the P7 ranks (last in segment) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.

Less suitable for

Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is WLTP range, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (1st with 629 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (1st with 250 kW) takes the lead.

Real-world range: 450 km WLTP (7th of 7 in WLTP range)

The P7 offers 450 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (629 km).

Charging: 80 kW DC (5th of 5 in DC charge power)

The P7 accepts up to 80 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (250 kW).

Segment positioning

Where the P7 stands against saloons electric

Comparison across 8 saloons electric marketed between 2018–2022.

WLTP range7e / 7
450 km
Min 450 km · Xpeng P7Max 629 km · Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD
DC charge power5e / 5
80 kW
Min 80 kW · Xpeng P7Max 250 kW · Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD
0–100 km/h5e / 8
4,3 s
Min 5,9 s · BYD Seal 313 2WDMax 3,3 s · Tesla Model 3 Performance

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Xpeng P7 Gen I range

Generation Gen I launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the Gen I

Compare

Popular duels involving the P7

Frequently asked questions

Xpeng P7: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 8 saloons electric 2018–2022, the P7 ranks 7th of 7 in WLTP range (450 km, behind the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD), 5th of 5 in DC charge power (80 kW, behind the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD), 5th of 8 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s, behind the Tesla Model 3 Performance).

450 km WLTP announced - making it the 7th of 7 in autonomie du segment out of 7 models. The reference is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (629 km).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD leads in WLTP range (629 km vs 450 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the P7 vs Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.