Among the 8 saloons electric 2018–2022, the P7 ranks 7th of 7 in WLTP range (450 km, behind the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD), 5th of 5 in DC charge power (80 kW, behind the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD), 5th of 8 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s, behind the Tesla Model 3 Performance).
P7
424 hp, 450 km range, 4,3 s 0-100 : among the 8 saloons electric 2018–2022, the P7 ranks 7th of 7 in WLTP range, 5th of 5 in DC charge power, 5th of 8 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
424hp
655 Nm · 430 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
4.3s
VMax 170 km/h
Range
450km
WLTP
DC charging
80kW
Full specifications Xpeng P7
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 430 hp |
| Combined power | 424 hp |
| Couple | 655 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 75 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 450 km |
| Charge AC max | 11 kW |
| Charge DC max | 80 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 17.2 kWh/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,3 s |
| VMax | 170 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,896 mm |
| Height | 1,450 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,040 kg |
| Cd | 0.236 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 8 saloons electric, the P7 ranks (last in segment) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.
If the priority is WLTP range, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (1st with 629 km) takes the lead. If the priority is DC charge power, the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (1st with 250 kW) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 450 km WLTP (7th of 7 in WLTP range)
The P7 offers 450 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (629 km).
Charging: 80 kW DC (5th of 5 in DC charge power)
The P7 accepts up to 80 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (250 kW).
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Where the P7 stands against saloons electric
Comparison across 8 saloons electric marketed between 2018–2022.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Xpeng P7 Gen I range
Generation Gen I launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the Gen I
Popular duels involving the P7
Xpeng P7: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
450 km WLTP announced - making it the 7th of 7 in autonomie du segment out of 7 models. The reference is the Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD (629 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD leads in WLTP range (629 km vs 450 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the P7 vs Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.