Over 0–100 km/h, A4 40 TFSI wins (7,28 s vs 7,48 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| A4 40 TFSI | 320i Touring G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,28 s−0,20 s | 7,48 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,36 s−0,09 s | 15,45 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,08 s−0,32 s | 28,40 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 232 km/h+2 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,97 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,53 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | A4 40 TFSI | 320i Touring G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,67 s | 1,46 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,79 s | 2,57 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,10 s | 5,12 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,28 s | 7,48 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,10 s | 10,48 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,44 s | 19,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 34,86 s | 37,39 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,36 s | 15,45 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,08 s | 28,40 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 515 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 570 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the A4 40 TFSI hits 100 km/h in 7.28 s versus 7.48 s for the Bmw 320i Touring. Despite the faster sprint time, the Bmw 320i Touring is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320i Touring is doing 117 km/h against 119 km/h for the A4 40 TFSI. The gap is 0.03 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A4 40 TFSI crosses the line in 15.36 s versus 15.44 s. The 0.08 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the A4 40 TFSI continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 165 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A4 40 TFSI finishes in 28.08 s versus 28.40 s, with a 0.32 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (232 vs 230 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw 320i Touring never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.97 kg/hp vs 8.53 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.30 seconds. The 0.20 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, A4 40 TFSI wins (7,28 s vs 7,48 s).
A4 40 TFSI goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,28 seconds (calibrated simulation).
A4 40 TFSI: 190 hp, ratio 7,97 kg/hp. 320i Touring G20: 184 hp, ratio 8,53 kg/hp.
A4 40 TFSI: 232 km/h. 320i Touring G20: 230 km/h.