Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,14 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| e-tron GT quattro | A110 GT 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,14 s | 3,92 s+0,22 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,36 s | 11,97 s+0,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,46 s | 21,76 s+0,70 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h | 272 km/h−27 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,95 kg/hp | 3,65 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | e-tron GT quattro | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 1,89 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,08 s | 3,06 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,14 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,47 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,25 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,74 s | 12,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,36 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,46 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 280 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 4.14 s for the e-tron GT quattro. Despite lacking instant torque, 305 hp of power compensates. The 0.22 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 149 km/h for the e-tron GT quattro. The gap is 0.18 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 12.36 s. The 0.40 s gap represents roughly 20 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the A110 GT 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 208 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 GT 300 finishes in 21.76 s versus 22.46 s, with a 0.70 s lead.
Electronically capped at 245 km/h, the e-tron GT quattro never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.28 seconds. The 0.22 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,14 s).
e-tron GT quattro goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,14 seconds (calibrated simulation).
e-tron GT quattro: 577 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp. A110 GT 300: 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
e-tron GT quattro: 245 km/h. A110 GT 300: 272 km/h.