Over 0–100 km/h, e-tron GT quattro wins (4,14 s vs 4,44 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| e-tron GT quattro | Model 3 Long Range AWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,14 s−0,30 s | 4,44 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,36 s−0,44 s | 12,80 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,46 s−1,03 s | 23,49 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h+12 km/h | 233 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,95 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,34 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | e-tron GT quattro | Model 3 Long Range AWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,18 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 1,97 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,08 s | 3,26 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,14 s | 4,44 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,47 s | 5,93 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,25 s | 10,48 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,74 s | 17,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,36 s | 12,80 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,46 s | 23,49 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 233 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 280 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 346 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 605 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 847 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the e-tron GT quattro hits 100 km/h in 4.14 s versus 4.44 s for the Model 3 Long Range AWD. At this point, the e-tron GT quattro leads by 0.30 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the e-tron GT quattro is doing 149 km/h against 143 km/h for the Model 3 Long Range AWD. The gap is 0.24 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the e-tron GT quattro crosses the line in 12.36 s versus 12.80 s. The 0.44 s gap represents roughly 21 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the e-tron GT quattro continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 208 km/h versus 196 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the e-tron GT quattro finishes in 22.46 s versus 23.49 s, with a 1.03 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (245 vs 233 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the e-tron GT quattro is capped at 245 km/h, the Model 3 Long Range AWD at 233 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.95 kg/hp vs 5.34 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.85 seconds. The 0.30 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, e-tron GT quattro wins (4,14 s vs 4,44 s).
e-tron GT quattro goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,14 seconds (calibrated simulation).
e-tron GT quattro: 577 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp. Model 3 Long Range AWD: 346 hp, ratio 5,34 kg/hp.
e-tron GT quattro: 245 km/h. Model 3 Long Range AWD: 233 km/h.