Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AQ3vsBFormentorPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsQ3 · Formentor

Audi Q3 Sportback vs Cupra Formentor: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2026 vs 2020 · Methodology
AudiPetrol

Q3 Sportback

150 hp · 250 Nm · 1,560 kg · 2026

VS
CupraPetrol

Formentor

150 hp · 250 Nm · 1,460 kg · 2020

Result · 0–100 km/h

AAudi Q3 Sportback

8.95 s

Gap0.01 sNot a significant gap
BCupra Formentor

8.94 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureQ3 SportbackFormentorGap
0–100 km/h8.95 s8.94 s0.01 s · Formentor
400 m standing start16.69 s16.67 s0.02 s · Formentor
1,000 m standing start30.71 s30.05 s0.66 s · Formentor
Top speed (electronically limited)207 km/h215 km/h8 km/h · Formentor
Power-to-weight ratio10.40 kg/hp9.73 kg/hpbetter ratio · Formentor

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiPetrolQ3 Sportback
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
CupraPetrolFormentor
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageQ3 SportbackFormentor
0–30 km/h1.85 s2.27 s
0–50 km/h3.14 s3.67 s
0–80 km/h6.10 s6.42 s
0–100 km/h8.95 s8.94 s · tight gap
0–120 km/h13.43 s12.33 s
0–160 km/h25.68 s22.37 s
0–200 km/h64.35 s45.57 s
400 m standing start16.69 s16.67 s · tight gap
1,000 m standing start30.71 s30.05 s
Top speed207 km/h215 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

Q3 Sportback

10,40kg/hpcompensated by −100 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power150 hpPending
Torque250 Nm
Weight1 560 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox7-stufige S tronic
Cupra

Formentor

9,73kg/hpratio better by 0,67 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power150 hpPending
Torque250 Nm
Weight1 460 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
Gearbox7-speed DSG

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Formentor hits 100 km/h in 8.94 s versus 8.95 s for the Q3 Sportback. The 0.01 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Q3 Sportback is doing 108 km/h against 113 km/h for the Formentor. The gap is 0.28 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.

At 400 metres standing start, the Formentor crosses the line in 16.67 s versus 16.68 s. The 0.02 s gap represents roughly 1 m of track

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Formentor continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 157 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Formentor finishes in 30.04 s versus 30.71 s, with a 0.67 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (207 vs 215 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q3 Sportback is capped at 207 km/h, the Formentor at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (10.40 kg/hp vs 9.73 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 15.86 seconds. The 0.01 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of Formentor
BMW X2 sDrive20iBMW X1 sDrive20dBMW X1 xDrive18d

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X1 sDrive18i

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X2 sDrive18i

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X2 sDrive18i

BMWVSAudi

X2 sDrive20i vs Q3 Sportback

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Q3 Sportback and Formentor are neck and neck (8,94 s vs 8,95 s, no significant gap).

Q3 Sportback goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,95 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Q3 Sportback: 150 hp, ratio 10,40 kg/hp. Formentor: 150 hp, ratio 9,73 kg/hp.

Q3 Sportback: 207 km/h. Formentor: 215 km/h.