Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AQ3vsBE-PACEPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsQ3 · E-PACE

Audi Q3 Sportback vs Jaguar E-PACE P200: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2026 vs 2018 · Methodology
AudiPetrolFaster

Q3 Sportback

265 hp · 400 Nm · 1,675 kg · 2026

VS
JaguarPetrol

E-PACE P200

200 hp · 320 Nm · 1,748 kg · 2018

Result · 0–100 km/h

AAudi Q3 Sportback

5.76 s

Gap2.59 sin favour of Q3 Sportback
BJaguar E-PACE P200

8.35 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureQ3 SportbackE-PACE P200Gap
0–100 km/h5.76 s8.35 s2.59 s · Q3 Sportback
400 m standing start14.18 s16.19 s2.01 s · Q3 Sportback
1,000 m standing start26.06 s29.41 s3.35 s · Q3 Sportback
Top speed (electronically limited)240 km/h215 km/h25 km/h · Q3 Sportback
Power-to-weight ratio6.32 kg/hp8.74 kg/hpbetter ratio · Q3 Sportback

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiPetrolQ3 Sportback
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
JaguarPetrolE-PACE P200
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageQ3 SportbackE-PACE P200
0–30 km/h1.31 s1.98 s
0–50 km/h2.19 s3.33 s
0–80 km/h3.98 s5.88 s
0–100 km/h5.76 s8.35 s
0–120 km/h8.32 s11.44 s
0–160 km/h14.56 s21.17 s
0–200 km/h25.96 s45.14 s
400 m standing start14.18 s16.19 s
1,000 m standing start26.06 s29.41 s
Top speed240 km/h215 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

Q3 Sportback

6,32kg/hpratio better by 2,42 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power265 hpPending
Torque400 Nm
Weight1 675 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox7-speed S tronic
Jaguar

E-PACE P200

8,74kg/hpcompensated by −73 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power200 hpPending
Torque320 Nm
Weight1 748 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox9-speed automatic ZF

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Q3 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 5.76 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Q3 Sportback leads by 2.59 s and sits roughly 26 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Q3 Sportback is doing 126 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 1.47 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Q3 Sportback crosses the line in 14.18 s versus 16.19 s. The 2.01 s gap represents roughly 77 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Q3 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 177 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q3 Sportback finishes in 26.06 s versus 29.41 s, with a 3.35 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q3 Sportback is capped at 240 km/h, the E-PACE P200 at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.32 kg/hp vs 8.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 2.59 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of Q3 Sportback
BMW X1 xDrive25iBMW X1 sDrive20iBMW X2 sDrive20i
Instead of E-PACE P200
BMW X1 xDrive25i

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

Q3 Sportback vs X1 xDrive25i

JaguarVSVolvo

E-PACE P200 vs XC40 B4

BMWVSAudi

X2 M35i vs Q3 Sportback

AudiVSJaguar

Q3 Sportback TFSI quattro S tronic 150 kW vs E-PACE P200

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Q3 Sportback wins (5,76 s vs 8,35 s).

Q3 Sportback goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,76 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Q3 Sportback: 265 hp, ratio 6,32 kg/hp. E-PACE P200: 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.

Q3 Sportback: 240 km/h. E-PACE P200: 215 km/h.