Sur 0–100 km/h, E-PACE P200 gagne (8,35 s vs 8,61 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,61 s | 8,35 s+0,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,48 s | 16,19 s+0,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 30,33 s | 29,41 s+0,92 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 215 km/h−55 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10,55 kg/hp | 8,74 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,25 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,75 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,27 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,61 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,72 s | 11,44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 22,64 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 45,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,48 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 30,33 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 120 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | E-PACE P200 2018 | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the E-PACE P200 hits 100 km/h in 8.35 s versus 8.61 s for the Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW. Despite lacking instant torque, 200 hp of power compensates. At this point, the E-PACE P200 leads by 0.26 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the E-PACE P200 is doing 115 km/h against 115 km/h for the Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW. The gap is 0.29 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the E-PACE P200 crosses the line in 16.19 s versus 16.48 s. The 0.29 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the E-PACE P200 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 159 km/h versus 156 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the E-PACE P200 finishes in 29.41 s versus 30.32 s, with a 0.91 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW is capped at 160 km/h, the E-PACE P200 at 215 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.73 seconds. The 0.26 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, E-PACE P200 gagne (8,35 s vs 8,61 s).
Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,61 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW : 201 hp, ratio 10,55 kg/hp. E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW : 160 km/h. E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h.