Over 0–100 km/h, X7 xDrive30d G07 wins (6,94 s vs 7,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X7 xDrive30d G07 | Q5 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,94 s−0,41 s | 7,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,05 s−0,24 s | 15,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,90 s−0,71 s | 28,61 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 227 km/h+1 km/h | 226 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,94 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X7 xDrive30d G07 | Q5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,27 s | 1,12 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,28 s | 2,19 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,66 s | 4,81 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,94 s | 7,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,88 s | 10,60 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,62 s | 21,04 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 36,01 s | 40,96 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,05 s | 15,29 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,90 s | 28,61 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 620 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 370 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 955 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X7 xDrive30d hits 100 km/h in 6.94 s versus 7.35 s for the Q5 SUV. The 0.41 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X7 xDrive30d is doing 119 km/h against 115 km/h for the Q5 SUV. The gap is 0.08 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X7 xDrive30d crosses the line in 15.04 s versus 15.29 s. The 0.24 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X7 xDrive30d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 164 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X7 xDrive30d finishes in 27.89 s versus 28.61 s, with a 0.71 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (227 vs 226 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw X7 xDrive30d and the Q5 SUV are governed to 227 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.94 kg/hp vs 9.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.47 seconds. The 0.41 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X7 xDrive30d G07 wins (6,94 s vs 7,35 s).
X7 xDrive30d G07 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,94 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X7 xDrive30d G07: 265 hp, ratio 8,94 kg/hp. Q5 SUV: 204 hp, ratio 9,58 kg/hp.
X7 xDrive30d G07: 227 km/h. Q5 SUV: 226 km/h.