Among the 6 F-SUV 2016–2020, the X7 xDrive30d ranks 1st of 5 in Combined consumption (6.8 L/100, behind the Bmw X7 xDrive30d), 1st of 5 in Tank range (1176 km, behind the Bmw X7 xDrive30d), 6th of 6 in 0–100 km/h (7.0 s, behind the Lamborghini Urus).
BMW X7 xDrive30d
265 hp, 7,0 s 0-100 : among the 6 F-SUV 2016–2020, the X7 xDrive30d ranks 1st of 5 in Combined consumption, 1st of 5 in Tank range, 6th of 6 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
265hp
620 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.0s
VMax 227 km/h
Cons.
6.8L
/100 km
Tank
80L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 6 cyl.
- Displacement
- 2,993 cm³
- Power
- 265 hp
- Couple
- 620 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 6.8 L/100 km
- Tank
- 80 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,0 s
- VMax
- 227 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 5,151 mm
- Wheelbase
- 3,105 mm
- Width
- 2,000 mm
- Height
- 1,805 mm
- Boot
- 326 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,370 kg
- Cd
- 0.33
- CO₂ WLTP
- 178 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 6 F-SUV, the X7 xDrive30d ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
F-SUV among the best in segment: 1st of 5 in Combined consumption (6.8 L/100), 1st of 5 in Tank range (1176 km).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Urus (1st with 3.6 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.8 L/100 L/100 (1st of 5 in Combined consumption)
The X7 xDrive30d consumes 6.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X7 xDrive30d (6.8 L/100).
Tank range: 1176 km (1st of 5 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X7 xDrive30d covers 1176 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1176 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the X7 xDrive30d stands against F-SUV
Comparison across 6 F-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.
Combined consumption1e / 5
6.8 L/100
Min 11.4 L/100 · Bmw X7 xDrive50iMax 6.8 L/100 · Bmw X7 xDrive30d
Tank range1e / 5
1 176 km
Min 728 km · Bmw X7 xDrive50iMax 1 176 km · Bmw X7 xDrive30d
0–100 km/h6e / 6
7,0 s
Min 7,0 s · Bmw X7 xDrive30dMax 3,6 s · Lamborghini Urus
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
HEVMercedes G 450 d367 hp · 5.8 sHEVMercedes G 450 d367 hp · 5.8 sPHEVLamborghini Urus SE653 hp · 3.4 sHEVMercedes G 500449 hp · 5.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X7 G07 range
Generation G07 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G07
Popular duels involving the X7 xDrive30d
BMW X7 xDrive30d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1176 km on a full tank (6.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 1st of 5 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.