Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan S 95B.3 gagne (4,73 s vs 5,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan S 95B.3 | Q5 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,73 s−1,09 s | 5,82 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,97 s−1,19 s | 14,16 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,67 s−2,51 s | 26,18 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 259 km/h+17 km/h | 242 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,68 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,00 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan S 95B.3 | Q5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,21 s | 1,23 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,02 s | 2,10 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,41 s | 4,02 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,73 s | 5,82 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,28 s | 8,15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,65 s | 14,89 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,56 s | 26,99 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,97 s | 14,16 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,67 s | 26,18 s |
| Top speed | 259 km/h | 242 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 930 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 905 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the Macan S hits 100 km/h in 4.73 s versus 5.82 s for the Q5 SUV. At this point, the Macan S leads by 1.09 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Macan S is doing 142 km/h against 127 km/h for the Q5 SUV. The gap is 0.64 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Macan S crosses the line in 12.97 s versus 14.16 s. The 1.19 s gap represents roughly 51 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Macan S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Macan S finishes in 23.67 s versus 26.17 s, with a 2.51 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan S is capped at 259 km/h, the Q5 SUV at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.68 kg/hp vs 7.00 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.52 seconds. The 1.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Macan S 95B.3 gagne (4,73 s vs 5,82 s).
Macan S 95B.3 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,73 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Macan S 95B.3 : 340 hp, ratio 5,68 kg/hp. Q5 SUV : 272 hp, ratio 7,00 kg/hp.
Macan S 95B.3 : 259 km/h. Q5 SUV : 242 km/h.