Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (7,07 s vs 7,52 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q6 Sportback e-tron | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,52 s | 7,07 s+0,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,61 s | 15,11 s+0,50 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,40 s | 28,09 s+0,31 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 226 km/h−16 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,43 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,09 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q6 Sportback e-tron | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,90 s | 1,17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,17 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,40 s | 4,70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,52 s | 7,07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,28 s | 10,12 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,94 s | 19,20 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 36,01 s | 37,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,61 s | 15,11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,40 s | 28,09 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 226 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 125 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 7.07 s versus 7.52 s for the Q6 Sportback e-tron. Despite lacking instant torque, 231 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Q7 SUV leads by 0.45 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 117 km/h against 120 km/h for the Q6 Sportback e-tron. The gap is 0.60 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q7 SUV crosses the line in 15.11 s versus 15.60 s. The 0.49 s gap represents roughly 20 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Q6 Sportback e-tron maxes out at 210 km/h while the Q7 SUV keeps accelerating towards 226 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.42 s.
At 1,000 metres, the Q7 SUV finishes in 28.09 s versus 28.40 s, with just 0.31 s to spare. The Q6 Sportback e-tron fails to fully close the launch gap.
The Q7 SUV features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Q6 Sportback e-tron’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q6 Sportback e-tron is capped at 210 km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.98 seconds. The 0.45 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV wins (7,07 s vs 7,52 s).
Q6 Sportback e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,52 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q6 Sportback e-tron: 252 hp, ratio 8,43 kg/hp. Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp.
Q6 Sportback e-tron: 210 km/h. Q7 SUV: 226 km/h.