Among the 15 D-SUV electric 2024–2028, the Q6 Sportback e-tron ranks 8th of 14 in WLTP range (545 km, behind the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology), 14th of 15 in 0–100 km/h (7.6 s, behind the Hyundai IONIQ 5 N).
Q6 Sportback e-tron
252 hp, 545 km range, 7,6 s 0-100 : among the 15 D-SUV electric 2024–2028, the Q6 Sportback e-tron ranks 8th of 14 in WLTP range, 14th of 15 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
252hp
450 Nm · 252 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
7.6s
VMax 210 km/h
Range
545km
WLTP
DC charging
-kW
Full specifications Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 252 hp |
| Combined power | 252 hp |
| Couple | 450 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 83 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 545 km |
| Charge AC max | 225 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 15.6 kWh/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,6 s |
| VMax | 210 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,771 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,893 mm |
| Width | 1,939 mm |
| Height | 1,611 mm |
| Boot | 511 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,125 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 0 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 15 D-SUV electric, the Q6 Sportback e-tron ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is WLTP range, the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (1st with 713 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Hyundai IONIQ 5 N (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 545 km WLTP (8th of 14 in WLTP range)
The Q6 Sportback e-tron offers 545 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (713 km).
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Where the Q6 Sportback e-tron stands against D-SUV electric
Comparison across 15 D-SUV electric marketed between 2024–2028.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Audi Q6 GY range
Generation GY launched in 2024. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the GY
Popular duels involving the Q6 Sportback e-tron
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
545 km WLTP announced - making it the 8th of 14 in autonomie du segment out of 14 models. The reference is the Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology (713 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology leads in WLTP range (713 km vs 545 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.