Sur 0–100 km/h, iX3 G08 gagne (6,86 s vs 7,52 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX3 G08 | Q6 Sportback e-tron | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,86 s−0,66 s | 7,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,08 s−0,53 s | 15,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,54 s−0,86 s | 28,40 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 210 km/h−30 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,64 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,43 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX3 G08 | Q6 Sportback e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,89 s | 1,90 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,16 s | 3,17 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,13 s | 5,40 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,86 s | 7,52 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,11 s | 10,28 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,42 s | 18,94 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 36,01 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,08 s | 15,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,54 s | 28,40 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | iX3 | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 125 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Bmw iX3 hits 100 km/h in 6.86 s versus 7.52 s for the Q6 Sportback e-tron. At this point, the Bmw iX3 leads by 0.66 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw iX3 is doing 126 km/h against 120 km/h for the Q6 Sportback e-tron. The gap is 0.27 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw iX3 crosses the line in 15.07 s versus 15.60 s. The 0.53 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw iX3 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 172 km/h versus 164 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw iX3 finishes in 27.54 s versus 28.40 s, with a 0.86 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (210 km/h), the Q6 Sportback e-tron never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw iX3 is capped at 180 km/h, the Q6 Sportback e-tron at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.64 kg/hp vs 8.43 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.98 seconds. The 0.66 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, iX3 G08 gagne (6,86 s vs 7,52 s).
iX3 G08 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,86 secondes (simulation calibrée).
iX3 G08 : 286 hp, ratio 7,64 kg/hp. Q6 Sportback e-tron : 252 hp, ratio 8,43 kg/hp.
iX3 G08 : 180 km/h. Q6 Sportback e-tron : 210 km/h.