Sur 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E RWD gagne (6,04 s vs 7,52 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Mustang Mach-E RWD | Q6 Sportback e-tron | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s−1,48 s | 7,52 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,39 s−1,22 s | 15,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,74 s−1,66 s | 28,40 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 210 km/h−30 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,01 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,43 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Mustang Mach-E RWD | Q6 Sportback e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,57 s | 1,90 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,63 s | 3,17 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,39 s | 5,40 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,04 s | 7,52 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,18 s | 10,28 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 14,98 s | 18,94 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 36,01 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,39 s | 15,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,74 s | 28,40 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 269 hp | |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 886 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 125 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Mustang Mach-E RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.04 s versus 7.52 s for the Q6 Sportback e-tron. At this point, the Mustang Mach-E RWD leads by 1.48 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD is doing 129 km/h against 120 km/h for the Q6 Sportback e-tron. The gap is 0.85 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Mustang Mach-E RWD crosses the line in 14.39 s versus 15.60 s. The 1.21 s gap represents roughly 49 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 164 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD finishes in 26.73 s versus 28.40 s, with a 1.67 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (210 km/h), the Q6 Sportback e-tron never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Mustang Mach-E RWD is capped at 180 km/h, the Q6 Sportback e-tron at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.01 kg/hp vs 8.43 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs auto).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.98 seconds. The 1.48 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E RWD gagne (6,04 s vs 7,52 s).
Mustang Mach-E RWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,04 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Mustang Mach-E RWD : 269 hp, ratio 7,01 kg/hp. Q6 Sportback e-tron : 252 hp, ratio 8,43 kg/hp.
Mustang Mach-E RWD : 180 km/h. Q6 Sportback e-tron : 210 km/h.