Mustang Mach-E RWD
269 hp, 440 km range, 6,1 s 0-100 : among the 24 D-SUV electric 2019–2023, the Mustang Mach-E RWD ranks 15th of 18 in WLTP range, 13th of 24 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
269hp
430 Nm · 269 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
6.1s
VMax 180 km/h
Range
440km
WLTP
DC charging
—kW
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Puissance électrique | 269 hp |
| Combined power | 269 hp |
| Couple | 430 Nm |
| Gearbox | REDUCER_2SPEED Automatic |
| Transmission | RWD |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 70 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 440 km |
| Conso élec WLTP | 17,0 kWh/100km |
| Cons. WLTP | 17,0 L/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,1 s |
| VMax | 180 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 1,881 mm |
| Height | 1,613 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,886 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 24 D-SUV electric, the Mustang Mach-E RWD ranks (in the bottom third) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is WLTP range, the Xpeng G6 (1st with 570 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Kia EV6 GT AWD (1st with 3.5 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 440 km WLTP (15th of 18 in WLTP range)
The Mustang Mach-E RWD offers 440 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Xpeng G6 (570 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Mustang Mach-E RWD stands against D-SUV electric
Comparison across 24 D-SUV electric marketed between 2019–2023.
WLTP range
15eout of 18
0–100 km/h
13eout of 24
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Model Y Juniper RWD
299 hp · 0-100 6.0 s
Q6 SUV e-tron
302 hp · 0-100 6.7 s
Q6 Sportback e-tron
306 hp · 0-100 6.7 s
EV6 AWD Long Range
325 hp · 0-100 5.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Mustang Mach-E RWD
Take the next step
Find a Mustang Mach-E RWD or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 24 D-SUV electric 2019–2023, the Mustang Mach-E RWD ranks 15th of 18 in WLTP range (440 km, behind the Xpeng G6), 13th of 24 in 0–100 km/h (6.1 s, behind the Kia EV6 GT AWD).
440 km WLTP announced — making it the 15th of 18 in autonomie du segment out of 18 models. The reference is the Xpeng G6 (570 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Xpeng G6 leads in WLTP range (570 km vs 440 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Mustang Mach-E RWD vs Xpeng G6 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.