Sur 0–100 km/h, X6 M50d F16 gagne (5,29 s vs 6,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X6 M50d F16 | Q7 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,29 s−0,86 s | 6,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s−0,78 s | 14,41 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,91 s−1,66 s | 26,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+9 km/h | 241 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,73 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,34 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X6 M50d F16 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,27 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,26 s | 2,16 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,83 s | 4,22 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,29 s | 6,15 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,14 s | 8,55 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,41 s | 15,63 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,42 s | 28,47 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s | 14,41 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,91 s | 26,57 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 241 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 740 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X6 M50d hits 100 km/h in 5.29 s versus 6.15 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the Bmw X6 M50d leads by 0.86 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X6 M50d is doing 135 km/h against 125 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 0.38 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X6 M50d crosses the line in 13.62 s versus 14.41 s. The 0.78 s gap represents roughly 33 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X6 M50d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 187 km/h versus 173 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X6 M50d finishes in 24.91 s versus 26.57 s, with a 1.66 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 241 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X6 M50d is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Q7 SUV at 241 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.73 kg/hp vs 7.34 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.07 seconds. The 0.86 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X6 M50d F16 gagne (5,29 s vs 6,15 s).
X6 M50d F16 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,29 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X6 M50d F16 : 381 hp, ratio 5,73 kg/hp. Q7 SUV : 286 hp, ratio 7,34 kg/hp.
X6 M50d F16 : 250 km/h. Q7 SUV : 241 km/h.