Sur 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV gagne (6,11 s vs 6,62 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | X5 xDrive30d F15 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,11 s−0,51 s | 6,62 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,37 s−0,46 s | 14,83 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,56 s−0,81 s | 27,37 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 241 km/h+11 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,62 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,96 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | X5 xDrive30d F15 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,18 s | 1,42 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,07 s | 2,38 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,16 s | 4,55 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,11 s | 6,62 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,55 s | 9,29 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,70 s | 17,18 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,52 s | 32,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,37 s | 14,83 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,56 s | 27,37 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 180 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 620 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 110 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 6.11 s versus 6.62 s for the Bmw X5 xDrive30d. At this point, the Q7 SUV leads by 0.51 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 125 km/h against 122 km/h for the Bmw X5 xDrive30d. The gap is 0.35 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q7 SUV crosses the line in 14.37 s versus 14.83 s. The 0.46 s gap represents roughly 19 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Q7 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 172 km/h versus 168 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q7 SUV finishes in 26.56 s versus 27.36 s, with a 0.81 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (241 vs 230 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q7 SUV is capped at 241 km/h, the Bmw X5 xDrive30d at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.62 kg/hp vs 7.96 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.88 seconds. The 0.51 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV gagne (6,11 s vs 6,62 s).
Q7 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,11 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q7 SUV : 286 hp, ratio 7,62 kg/hp. X5 xDrive30d F15 : 265 hp, ratio 7,96 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV : 241 km/h. X5 xDrive30d F15 : 230 km/h.