Among the 21 E-SUV 2016–2020, the X5 xDrive30d ranks 1st of 21 in Combined consumption (6.7 L/100, behind the Bmw X5 xDrive30d), 3rd of 21 in Tank range (1194 km, behind the Bmw X6 xDrive30d), 19th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (6.5 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe).
BMW X5 xDrive30d
265 hp, 6,5 s 0-100 : among the 21 E-SUV 2016–2020, the X5 xDrive30d ranks 1st of 21 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 21 in Tank range, 19th of 21 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
265hp
620 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.5s
VMax 230 km/h
Cons.
6.7L
/100 km
Tank
80L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 6 cyl.
- Displacement
- 2,993 cm³
- Power
- 265 hp
- Couple
- 620 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 6.7 L/100 km
- Tank
- 80 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,5 s
- VMax
- 230 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,922 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,975 mm
- Width
- 2,004 mm
- Height
- 1,745 mm
- Boot
- 650 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,110 kg
- Cd
- 0.31
- CO₂ WLTP
- 175 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 21 E-SUV, the X5 xDrive30d ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
E-SUV among the best in segment: 1st of 21 in Combined consumption (6.7 L/100), 3rd of 21 in Tank range (1194 km).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X6 xDrive30d (1st with 1197 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.7 L/100 L/100 (1st of 21 in Combined consumption)
The X5 xDrive30d consumes 6.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X5 xDrive30d (6.7 L/100).
Tank range: 1194 km (3rd of 21 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X5 xDrive30d covers 1194 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1197 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the X5 xDrive30d stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 21 E-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.
Combined consumption1e / 21
6.7 L/100
Min 13.7 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne Turbo CoupeMax 6.7 L/100 · Bmw X5 xDrive30d
Tank range3e / 21
1 194 km
Min 173 km · Porsche Cayenne Turbo CoupeMax 1 197 km · Bmw X6 xDrive30d
0–100 km/h19e / 21
6,5 s
Min 6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 3,8 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
DieselPorsche Cayenne Diesel262 hp · 7.2 sDieselAudi Q7 SUV286 hp · 6.1 sDieselAudi Q7 SUV286 hp · 6.1 sDieselAudi Q8 SUV286 hp · 6.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X5 F15 range
Generation F15 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F15
Popular duels involving the X5 xDrive30d
BMW X5 xDrive30d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1194 km on a full tank (6.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 3rd of 21 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.