F15 · GENERATION 2018 · LARGE SUV
BMWICE

X5 xDrive30d

265 hp, 6,5 s 0-100 : among the 21 E-SUV 2016–2020, the X5 xDrive30d ranks 1st of 21 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 21 in Tank range, 19th of 21 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,72915,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

265hp

620 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

6.5s

VMax 230 km/h

Cons.

6.7L

/100 km

Tank

80L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X5 xDrive30d

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 6 cyl.
Displacement2,993 cm\u00b3
Power265 hp
Couple620 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6,7 L/100km
Tank80 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,5 s
VMax230 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,922 mm
Wheelbase2,975 mm
Width2,004 mm
Height1,745 mm
Boot650 L
Kerb weight2,110 kg
Cd0.31
CO₂ WLTP175 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 21 E-SUV, the X5 xDrive30d ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

E-SUV among the best in segment: 1st of 21 in Combined consumption (6.7 L/100), 3rd of 21 in Tank range (1194 km).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X6 xDrive30d (1st with 1197 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe (1st with 3.8 s) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.7 L/100 L/100 (1st of 21 in Combined consumption)

The X5 xDrive30d consumes 6.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X5 xDrive30d (6.7 L/100).

Tank range: 1194 km (3rd of 21 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X5 xDrive30d covers 1194 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1197 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X5 xDrive30d stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 21 E-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.

Combined consumption

1eout of 21

6.7 L/100
Min13.7 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Max6.7 L/100 · Bmw X5 xDrive30d

Tank range

3eout of 21

1 194 km
Min173 km · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe
Max1 197 km · Bmw X6 xDrive30d

0–100 km/h

19eout of 21

6,5 s
Min6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300
Max3,8 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X5 F15 range

Generation F15 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F15

Compare

Popular duels involving the X5 xDrive30d

Take the next step

Find a X5 xDrive30d or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW X5 xDrive30d: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X5 xDrive30d rank in its segment?#

Among the 21 E-SUV 2016–2020, the X5 xDrive30d ranks 1st of 21 in Combined consumption (6.7 L/100, behind the Bmw X5 xDrive30d), 3rd of 21 in Tank range (1194 km, behind the Bmw X6 xDrive30d), 19th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (6.5 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo Coupe).

What is the range of the X5 xDrive30d?#

1194 km on a full tank (6.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 3rd of 21 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the X5 xDrive30d cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.