Sur 0–100 km/h, X5 M50d F15 gagne (5,15 s vs 5,97 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X5 M50d F15 | Q8 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s−0,82 s | 5,97 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s−0,78 s | 14,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,61 s−1,75 s | 26,36 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+9 km/h | 241 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,69 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,55 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X5 M50d F15 | Q8 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,15 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,15 s | 2,02 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,71 s | 4,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s | 5,97 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,95 s | 8,37 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,03 s | 15,33 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 20,34 s | 27,89 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s | 14,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,61 s | 26,36 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 241 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 160 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X5 M50d hits 100 km/h in 5.15 s versus 5.97 s for the Q8 SUV. At this point, the Bmw X5 M50d leads by 0.82 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X5 M50d is doing 136 km/h against 125 km/h for the Q8 SUV. The gap is 0.36 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X5 M50d crosses the line in 13.47 s versus 14.25 s. The 0.78 s gap represents roughly 33 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X5 M50d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 189 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X5 M50d finishes in 24.60 s versus 26.36 s, with a 1.76 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 241 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X5 M50d is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Q8 SUV at 241 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.69 kg/hp vs 7.55 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.86 seconds. The 0.82 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X5 M50d F15 gagne (5,15 s vs 5,97 s).
X5 M50d F15 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,15 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X5 M50d F15 : 400 hp, ratio 5,69 kg/hp. Q8 SUV : 286 hp, ratio 7,55 kg/hp.
X5 M50d F15 : 250 km/h. Q8 SUV : 241 km/h.