Audi Q8 SUV
286 hp, 6,1 s 0-100 : among the 14 E-SUV 2024–2028, the Q8 SUV ranks 5th of 14 in Combined consumption, 5th of 14 in Tank range, 10th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 286 hp
- 600 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6.1 s
- VMax 241 km/h
- Cons.
- 8.8 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 75 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 2,967 cm³
- Power
- 286 hp
- Couple
- 600 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 8.8 L/100 km
- Tank
- 75 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,1 s
- VMax
- 241 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,992 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,998 mm
- Width
- 1,995 mm
- Height
- 1,678 mm
- Boot
- 604 L
- Kerb weight
- 2,160 kg
- Cd
- 0.35
- CO₂ WLTP
- 231 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 E-SUV, the Q8 SUV ranks (top 5 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
E-SUV among the best in segment: 5th of 14 in Combined consumption (8.8 L/100), 5th of 14 in Tank range (852 km).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 8,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the Audi Q7 SUV (1st with 8.4 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi Q7 SUV (1st with 893 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 8.8 L/100 L/100 (5th of 14 in Combined consumption)
The Q8 SUV consumes 8.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Audi Q7 SUV (8.4 L/100).
Tank range: 852 km (5th of 14 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Q8 SUV covers 852 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 893 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the Q8 SUV stands against E-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Audi Q8 4MN range
Generation 4MN launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 4MN
Popular duels involving the Q8 SUV
Continue with the Audi Q8 SUV
The same car, from other angles.
Audi Q8 SUV: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Q8 SUV rank in its segment?
Among the 14 E-SUV 2024–2028, the Q8 SUV ranks 5th of 14 in Combined consumption (8.8 L/100, behind the Audi Q7 SUV), 5th of 14 in Tank range (852 km, behind the Audi Q7 SUV), 10th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (6.1 s, behind the Audi RS Q8 SUV).
What is the range of the Q8 SUV?
852 km on a full tank (8.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 5th of 14 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the Q8 SUV cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Audi Q7 SUV instead?
The Audi Q7 SUV leads in Combined consumption (8.4 L/100 vs 8.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Q8 SUV vs Audi Q7 SUV duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.