Sur 0–100 km/h, Q8 SUV gagne (5,57 s vs 6,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q8 SUV | G6 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,57 s−1,25 s | 6,82 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,90 s−1,06 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,54 s−1,28 s | 26,82 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 244 km/h+44 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,18 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,99 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q8 SUV | G6 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,32 s | 1,81 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,23 s | 3,01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,97 s | 5,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,57 s | 6,82 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,62 s | 9,13 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,49 s | 15,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,95 s | 25,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,90 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,54 s | 26,82 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 440 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Q8 SUV hits 100 km/h in 5.57 s versus 6.82 s for the G6. Despite lacking instant torque, 340 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Q8 SUV leads by 1.25 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q8 SUV is doing 131 km/h against 126 km/h for the G6. The gap is 0.87 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q8 SUV crosses the line in 13.90 s versus 14.96 s. The 1.06 s gap represents roughly 45 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Q8 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 181 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q8 SUV finishes in 25.53 s versus 26.81 s, with a 1.28 s lead.
The Q8 SUV features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the G6’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q8 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the G6 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.49 seconds. The 1.25 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Q8 SUV gagne (5,57 s vs 6,82 s).
Q8 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,57 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q8 SUV : 340 hp, ratio 6,18 kg/hp. G6 : 292 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp.
Q8 SUV : 244 km/h. G6 : 200 km/h.