Over 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sedan wins (3,85 s vs 5,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 3 Sedan | X5 M50d F15 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,85 s−1,30 s | 5,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,05 s−1,42 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,96 s−2,65 s | 24,61 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,69 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 3 Sedan | X5 M50d F15 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,03 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,72 s | 2,15 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,82 s | 3,71 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,85 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,04 s | 6,95 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,78 s | 12,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,65 s | 20,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,05 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,96 s | 24,61 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 565 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the RS 3 Sedan hits 100 km/h in 3.85 s versus 5.15 s for the Bmw X5 M50d. At this point, the RS 3 Sedan leads by 1.30 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 3 Sedan is doing 151 km/h against 136 km/h for the Bmw X5 M50d. The gap is 0.96 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 3 Sedan crosses the line in 12.04 s versus 13.47 s. The 1.43 s gap represents roughly 65 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS 3 Sedan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 212 km/h versus 189 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 3 Sedan finishes in 21.96 s versus 24.60 s, with a 2.65 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS 3 Sedan and the Bmw X5 M50d are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.91 kg/hp vs 5.69 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.07 seconds. The 1.30 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sedan wins (3,85 s vs 5,15 s).
RS 3 Sedan goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,85 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS 3 Sedan: 400 hp, ratio 3,91 kg/hp. X5 M50d F15: 400 hp, ratio 5,69 kg/hp.
RS 3 Sedan: 250 km/h. X5 M50d F15: 250 km/h.