Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sedan gagne (3,85 s vs 4,42 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M2 Competition F87 | RS 3 Sedan | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s | 3,85 s+0,57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 12,05 s+0,25 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s | 21,96 s+0,01 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,77 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,91 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M2 Competition F87 | RS 3 Sedan |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,03 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,22 s | 1,72 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,53 s | 2,82 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s | 3,85 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,56 s | 5,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,53 s | 8,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,00 s | 13,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 12,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s | 21,96 stight gap |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 411 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 550 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M2 Competition | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 565 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the RS 3 Sedan hits 100 km/h in 3.85 s versus 4.43 s for the Bmw M2 Competition. At this point, the RS 3 Sedan leads by 0.57 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 3 Sedan is doing 151 km/h against 157 km/h for the Bmw M2 Competition. The gap is 0.41 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 3 Sedan crosses the line in 12.04 s versus 12.30 s. The 0.25 s gap represents roughly 14 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows.
At 1,000 metres, the RS 3 Sedan finishes in 21.96 s versus 21.96 s, with just 0.01 s to spare. The Bmw M2 Competition fails to fully close the launch gap.
On paper, the Bmw M2 Competition combines 411 hp, 550 Nm and 1,550 kg — a clear theoretical edge over the RS 3 Sedan. Yet the RS 3 Sedan launches quicker. At standstill, both motors deliver peak torque from 0 rpm: the decisive factor is no longer raw power, but available grip. If the RS 3 Sedan has a better traction coefficient (tyres, weight distribution, traction control calibration), it puts down more force despite inferior specs — exactly what the simulation reflects, calibrated on manufacturer 0-100 km/h times.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M2 Competition and the RS 3 Sedan are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.77 kg/hp vs 3.91 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.20 seconds. The 0.57 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 3 Sedan gagne (3,85 s vs 4,42 s).
M2 Competition F87 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,42 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M2 Competition F87 : 411 hp, ratio 3,77 kg/hp. RS 3 Sedan : 400 hp, ratio 3,91 kg/hp.
M2 Competition F87 : 250 km/h. RS 3 Sedan : 250 km/h.