Over 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Avant wins (3,66 s vs 5,32 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 5 Avant | 740Le xDrive iPerformance G11 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,66 s−1,67 s | 5,32 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,72 s−1,82 s | 13,54 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,36 s−3,37 s | 24,73 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,71 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,13 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 5 Avant | 740Le xDrive iPerformance G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,97 s | 1,17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,61 s | 1,96 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,67 s | 3,63 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,66 s | 5,32 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,82 s | 7,19 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,97 s | 12,49 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,48 s | 20,49 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,72 s | 13,54 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,36 s | 24,73 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 639 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 825 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 370 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 000 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the RS 5 Avant hits 100 km/h in 3.66 s versus 5.32 s for the Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformance. At this point, the RS 5 Avant leads by 1.67 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 5 Avant is doing 156 km/h against 134 km/h for the Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformance. The gap is 1.14 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 5 Avant crosses the line in 11.72 s versus 13.54 s. The 1.82 s gap represents roughly 81 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS 5 Avant continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 218 km/h versus 188 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 5 Avant finishes in 21.35 s versus 24.72 s, with a 3.37 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS 5 Avant and the Bmw 740Le xDrive iPerformance are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.71 kg/hp vs 6.13 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.34 seconds. The 1.67 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Avant wins (3,66 s vs 5,32 s).
RS 5 Avant goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,66 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS 5 Avant: 639 hp, ratio 3,71 kg/hp. 740Le xDrive iPerformance G11: 326 hp, ratio 6,13 kg/hp.
RS 5 Avant: 250 km/h. 740Le xDrive iPerformance G11: 250 km/h.