Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Avant gagne (3,66 s vs 4,12 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 5 Avant | M2 G87 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,66 s−0,46 s | 4,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,72 s−0,36 s | 12,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,36 s−0,45 s | 21,81 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 285 km/h−35 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,71 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,76 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 5 Avant | M2 G87 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,97 s | 1,17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,61 s | 1,95 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,67 s | 3,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,66 s | 4,12 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,82 s | 5,26 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,97 s | 8,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,48 s | 13,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,72 s | 12,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,36 s | 21,81 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 285 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 639 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 825 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 370 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic |
Off the line, the RS 5 Avant hits 100 km/h in 3.66 s versus 4.12 s for the M2. The instant torque of 825 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the RS 5 Avant leads by 0.46 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 5 Avant is doing 156 km/h against 155 km/h for the M2. The gap is 0.34 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 5 Avant crosses the line in 11.72 s versus 12.08 s. The 0.36 s gap represents roughly 19 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the RS 5 Avant continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 218 km/h versus 215 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 5 Avant finishes in 21.35 s versus 21.80 s, with a 0.45 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (285 km/h), the M2 never recovers its launch deficit.
The RS 5 Avant features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the M2’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS 5 Avant is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the M2 at 285 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.94 seconds. The 0.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Avant gagne (3,66 s vs 4,12 s).
RS 5 Avant passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,66 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS 5 Avant : 639 hp, ratio 3,71 kg/hp. M2 G87 : 460 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp.
RS 5 Avant : 250 km/h. M2 G87 : 285 km/h.