Over 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Sedan wins (3,73 s vs 8,51 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS 5 Sedan | G9 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,73 s−4,78 s | 8,51 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,78 s−4,54 s | 16,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,38 s−7,33 s | 28,71 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+50 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,69 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,18 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS 5 Sedan | G9 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,01 s | 2,41 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,68 s | 4,03 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,74 s | 6,49 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,73 s | 8,51 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,89 s | 11,09 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,03 s | 18,51 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,49 s | 31,05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,78 s | 16,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,38 s | 28,71 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 639 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 825 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 355 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 308 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 210 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the RS 5 Sedan hits 100 km/h in 3.73 s versus 8.51 s for the G9. At this point, the RS 5 Sedan leads by 4.78 s and sits roughly 32 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS 5 Sedan is doing 156 km/h against 120 km/h for the G9. The gap is 3.32 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS 5 Sedan crosses the line in 11.77 s versus 16.32 s. The 4.55 s gap represents roughly 174 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS 5 Sedan continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 218 km/h versus 169 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS 5 Sedan finishes in 21.38 s versus 28.71 s, with a 7.33 s lead.
The RS 5 Sedan features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the G9’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS 5 Sedan is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the G9 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.69 kg/hp vs 7.18 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.63 seconds. The 4.78 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS 5 Sedan wins (3,73 s vs 8,51 s).
RS 5 Sedan goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,73 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS 5 Sedan: 639 hp, ratio 3,69 kg/hp. G9: 308 hp, ratio 7,18 kg/hp.
RS 5 Sedan: 250 km/h. G9: 200 km/h.