Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,33 s vs 6,80 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS e-tron GT | 225xe iPerformance F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s−3,47 s | 6,80 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s−3,64 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s−6,33 s | 26,93 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+48 km/h | 202 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,57 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,17 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS e-tron GT | 225xe iPerformance F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,95 s | 1,85 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,59 s | 3,08 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,55 s | 5,03 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s | 6,80 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,32 s | 9,05 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,15 s | 15,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,16 s | 27,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s | 26,93 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 202 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 671 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 385 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 605 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the RS e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.33 s versus 6.80 s for the Bmw 225xe iPerformance. At this point, the RS e-tron GT leads by 3.47 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS e-tron GT is doing 163 km/h against 126 km/h for the Bmw 225xe iPerformance. The gap is 2.53 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.31 s versus 14.96 s. The 3.64 s gap represents roughly 149 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS e-tron GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 227 km/h versus 176 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS e-tron GT finishes in 20.60 s versus 26.93 s, with a 6.33 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS e-tron GT is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 225xe iPerformance at 202 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.57 kg/hp vs 7.17 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.41 seconds. The 3.47 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,33 s vs 6,80 s).
RS e-tron GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,33 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS e-tron GT: 671 hp, ratio 3,57 kg/hp. 225xe iPerformance F44: 224 hp, ratio 7,17 kg/hp.
RS e-tron GT: 250 km/h. 225xe iPerformance F44: 202 km/h.