Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,33 s vs 6,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS e-tron GT | 320d G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s−3,50 s | 6,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s−3,64 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s−7,00 s | 27,60 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+10 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,57 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,11 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS e-tron GT | 320d G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,95 s | 1,25 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,59 s | 2,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,55 s | 4,65 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,33 s | 6,83 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,32 s | 9,65 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,15 s | 17,86 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,16 s | 32,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,32 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,60 s | 27,60 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 671 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 540 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the RS e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.33 s versus 6.83 s for the Bmw 320d. The instant torque of 830 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the RS e-tron GT leads by 3.50 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS e-tron GT is doing 163 km/h against 120 km/h for the Bmw 320d. The gap is 2.23 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.31 s versus 14.95 s. The 3.64 s gap represents roughly 141 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS e-tron GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 227 km/h versus 166 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS e-tron GT finishes in 20.60 s versus 27.60 s, with a 7.00 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS e-tron GT is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 320d at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.30 seconds. The 3.50 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT wins (3,33 s vs 6,83 s).
RS e-tron GT goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,33 seconds (calibrated simulation).
RS e-tron GT: 671 hp, ratio 3,57 kg/hp. 320d G20: 190 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp.
RS e-tron GT: 250 km/h. 320d G20: 240 km/h.