Sur 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT gagne (3,34 s vs 5,92 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS e-tron GT | 330e G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,34 s−2,58 s | 5,92 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,17 s−3,06 s | 14,23 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,27 s−5,98 s | 26,25 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+20 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,25 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,90 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS e-tron GT | 330e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,98 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,64 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,63 s | 4,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,34 s | 5,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,24 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,79 s | 14,85 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,40 s | 27,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,17 s | 14,23 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,27 s | 26,25 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 738 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 740 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the RS e-tron GT hits 100 km/h in 3.34 s versus 5.92 s for the Bmw 330e. At this point, the RS e-tron GT leads by 2.58 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the RS e-tron GT is doing 167 km/h against 128 km/h for the Bmw 330e. The gap is 1.87 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS e-tron GT crosses the line in 11.17 s versus 14.23 s. The 3.06 s gap represents roughly 127 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the RS e-tron GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 233 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS e-tron GT finishes in 20.27 s versus 26.25 s, with a 5.98 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the RS e-tron GT is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 330e at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.25 kg/hp vs 6.90 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.56 seconds. The 2.58 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, RS e-tron GT gagne (3,34 s vs 5,92 s).
RS e-tron GT passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,34 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS e-tron GT : 738 hp, ratio 3,25 kg/hp. 330e G20 : 252 hp, ratio 6,90 kg/hp.
RS e-tron GT : 250 km/h. 330e G20 : 230 km/h.