Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition F82 gagne (3,83 s vs 3,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| S8 | M4 Competition F82 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,83 s+0,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,81 s | 11,61 s+0,20 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,27 s | 20,89 s+0,38 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,89 kg/hp | 3,38 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | S8 | M4 Competition F82 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,07 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,78 s | 1,88 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,88 s | 2,97 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,83 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,97 s | 4,79 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,99 s | 7,46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,24 s | 11,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,81 s | 11,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,27 s | 20,89 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 571 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 800 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 220 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 725 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
Off the line, the Bmw M4 Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 3.83 s for the S8. The 0.00 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition is doing 163 km/h against 157 km/h for the S8. The gap is 0.06 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 Competition crosses the line in 11.61 s versus 11.81 s. The 0.20 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 227 km/h versus 222 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 Competition finishes in 20.89 s versus 21.26 s, with a 0.38 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the S8 and the Bmw M4 Competition are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.89 kg/hp vs 3.38 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.62 seconds. The 0.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M4 Competition F82 gagne (3,83 s vs 3,83 s).
S8 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,83 secondes (simulation calibrée).
S8 : 571 hp, ratio 3,89 kg/hp. M4 Competition F82 : 510 hp, ratio 3,38 kg/hp.
S8 : 250 km/h. M4 Competition F82 : 250 km/h.