Over 0–100 km/h, SQ2 wins (4,94 s vs 8,73 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ2 | Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,94 s−3,79 s | 8,73 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s−2,93 s | 16,40 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,55 s−5,15 s | 29,70 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 257 km/h+77 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,12 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ2 | Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,24 s | 2,06 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,07 s | 3,45 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,54 s | 6,07 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,94 s | 8,73 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,19 s | 11,64 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,14 s | 22,08 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,93 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13,47 s | 16,40 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,55 s | 29,70 s |
| Top speed | 257 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp | E4 |
| Torque | 205 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 370 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | E-Tech Multi-Mode dog-clutch (ICE: 4-speed, EV: 2-speed) |
Off the line, the SQ2 hits 100 km/h in 4.94 s versus 8.73 s for the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160. At this point, the SQ2 leads by 3.79 s and sits roughly 29 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ2 is doing 133 km/h against 114 km/h for the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160. The gap is 2.07 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ2 crosses the line in 13.47 s versus 16.39 s. The 2.92 s gap represents roughly 109 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ2 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ2 finishes in 24.55 s versus 29.70 s, with a 5.15 s lead.
The SQ2 features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160’s FWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Electronically capped at 180 km/h, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.12 kg/hp vs 8.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.81 seconds. The 3.79 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ2 wins (4,94 s vs 8,73 s).
SQ2 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,94 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ2: 300 hp, ratio 5,12 kg/hp. Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160: 160 hp, ratio 8,56 kg/hp.
SQ2: 257 km/h. Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160: 180 km/h.