Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 Sportback gagne (4,42 s vs 6,75 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ5 Sportback | X6 xDrive30d F16 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s−2,33 s | 6,75 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s−2,18 s | 14,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s−3,95 s | 27,45 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+20 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,56 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,00 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ5 Sportback | X6 xDrive30d F16 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,06 s | 1,54 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,78 s | 2,54 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,15 s | 4,70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s | 6,75 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,02 s | 9,41 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,50 s | 17,18 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,55 s | 32,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,76 s | 14,94 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,50 s | 27,45 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 560 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 065 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the SQ5 Sportback hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 6.75 s for the Bmw X6 xDrive30d. At this point, the SQ5 Sportback leads by 2.33 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 Sportback is doing 142 km/h against 122 km/h for the Bmw X6 xDrive30d. The gap is 1.45 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 Sportback crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 14.94 s. The 2.18 s gap represents roughly 88 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the SQ5 Sportback continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 168 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ5 Sportback finishes in 23.50 s versus 27.44 s, with a 3.94 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ5 Sportback is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw X6 xDrive30d at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.56 kg/hp vs 8.00 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.98 seconds. The 2.33 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 Sportback gagne (4,42 s vs 6,75 s).
SQ5 Sportback passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,42 secondes (simulation calibrée).
SQ5 Sportback : 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp. X6 xDrive30d F16 : 258 hp, ratio 8,00 kg/hp.
SQ5 Sportback : 250 km/h. X6 xDrive30d F16 : 230 km/h.